dm: core: Correct the return value for uclass_find_first_device()
This function returns -ENODEV when there is no device. This is inconsistent with other functions, such as uclass_find_next_device(), which returns 0. Update it and tidy up the incorrect '-1' values in the comments. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ int uclass_find_first_device(enum uclass_id id, struct udevice **devp)
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
if (list_empty(&uc->dev_head))
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
*devp = list_first_entry(&uc->dev_head, struct udevice, uclass_node);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user